April 2, 2020
by Jason Dickstein
This morning, the FAA sent a letter to ASA authorizing ASA to conduct remote audits during the Covid-19 National Emergency.
This will allow ASA-100 accredited companies to obtain audits during the coronavirus crisis, and to maintain their ASA-100 and AC 00-56B accreditation. ASA will continue to play its part in supporting safety through the aviation supply chain.
What if you are accredited to AC 00-56B through an ASACB audit under one of the ISO standards: ISO9001, AS9100, AS9110 or AS9120? No problem. ASACB also secured permission from the FAA to perform remote audits for AC 00-56B accreditees under one of the FAA-recognized ISO9001, AS9100, AS9110 and AS9120. ANAB, the ANSI National Accreditation Board, has already issued permission for ASACB to perform remote audits. Both sets of permission are necessary, because both FAA and ANAB have oversight authority over ASACB.
Background
Why did ASA need to go through this formal approval process?
FAA AC 00-56 Accreditation Supports Safety
In the 1980s and 1990s, there were industry concerns that aircraft parts distribution could be a source of inadequate parts that failed to meet safety standards. The FAA investigated a number of options, such as regulating distibutors, and decided to try setting voluntary standards and permitting third party oversight as a tool for establishing safety assurance standards to be used in distribution.
The FAA published AC 00-56 (the Voluntary Industry Distributor Accreditation Program) in 1996. The program recognized Accreditation Organizations with standards that were considered acceptable to the FAA. One of those Accreditation Organizations was ASA, which used ASA-100 (and later was also permitted to use ISO9001, AS9100, AS9110 and AS9120). The recognized Accreditation Organizations were permitted to audit Distributors’ compliance to the published voluntary standard. This meant that the distributor had to meet the quality standard (ASA-100, ISO9001, AS9100, AS9110 or AS9120) and also all of the elements of AC )0-56.
Since the inspection of the program, the FAA has audited ASA to gauge the success of the program. FAA program audits have confirmed that this AC 00-56B program reflects a sound safety program that makes a positive contribution to aviation safety. The AC 00-56 Program has become an important tool to assist the FAA in ensuring aviation safety.
AC 00-56 has become a globally recognized program. There are AC 00-56 accredited distributors on every continent except Antarctica. The European Union has promulgated laws requiring Part 145 certificate holders to have procedures for accepting components. EASA 145.A.42(b)(i). EASA has interpreted this to mean that 145 organizations must evaluate their suppliers (EASA AMC1 145.A.42(b)(i) Components, ¶ (b)). AC 00-56 (and ASA-100) has been recognized as an acceptable program for supplier evaluation under European supplier control laws (EASA GM3 145.A.42(b)(i) Components, ¶ (b)(4)). ASA has been in talks with other civil aviation authorities around the world to encourage them to adopt similar provisions recognizing the value of distributor accreditation.
AC 00-56B Requires Onsite Auditing
One of the features of the AC 00-56B program is onsite auditing of the Distributors. AC 00-56B requires onsite audits in section eight, paragraphs (b) and (f). The onsite audits are performed by qualified auditors who meet the requirements of AC 00-56B, under the coordination of Accreditation Organizations recognized in AC 00-56B.
On March 13, 2020, President Trump issued a Proclamation on Declaring a National Emergency Concerning the Novel Coronavirus Outbreak. The Proclamation recognized that “[t]he spread of COVID-19 within our Nation’s communities threatens to strain our Nation’s healthcare systems.” Since that date, many United States governors and mayors have issued correlative orders: restricting travel and requiring people to remain in their residences. Covid-19 has affected the availability and advisability of travel.
Health concerns related to Covid-19 are making onsite auditing under AC 00-56B an unnecessary risk. Travel restrictions and state “stay-at-home” orders are making it impractical to perform onsite auditing under AC 00-56B. Remote auditing mitigates the risks posed by onsite auditing, while providing a practical response to the need to “stay-at-home” to reduce disease transmission.
While remote auditing seems like the right response, it is still not permitted under AC 00-56B. Thus, the industry needed a formal FAA deviation or exemption that permitted remote auditing. ASA discussed with the FAA issuing a Notice to permit industry-wide remote auditing under AC 00-56B, but the FAA was uncomfortable with this because of the need for procedures that would ensure remote auditing was successful. ASA petitioned the FAA to permit ASA to perform remote audits, based upon ASA’s remote auditing process and remote auditing auditor training program.
Remote Auditing the Right Way
The FAA authority is subject to ASA’s internal procedures for remote auditing, which have been developed by the audit team to help ensure an equivalent level of safety assurance. These procedures include new techniques for investigation by the audit team, and identification of objective evidence of adequate compliance.
ASA has already performed auditor training to teach the audit team how to perform remote auditing successfully. Additional staff training is now planned for the approved procedures.
The current ASA authorization from the FAA for remote auditing is valid from April 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020. The scope is global, so that ASA can continue to provide services to clients everywhere in the world.
Accreditation Alert! DRAFT AC 00-56B is out for comment!
December 17, 2014 by Jason Dickstein 2 Comments
The FAA has released for public comment AC 00-56B, which is the draft revision to the Voluntary Industry Distributor Accreditation Program (current version is AC 00-56A).
This draft FAA advisory circular (AC) describes a system for accrediting aircraft parts distributors based on compliance to a standard and certification of that compliance by FAA-acceptable accreditation organizations. ASA has been part of this program since the beginning, and is an important FAA partner in the mission to improve aviation safety through effective management systems.
The FAA has strongly endorsed participation in the AC 00-56 program. FAA is revising this AC to reflect the changes in regulatory requirements and industry practices since the last revision.
ASA met with its Quality Assurance Committee (QAC) on December 5 to review and examine this proposed change. The QAC was generally supportive of the draft AC, and spent its time examining ways to further improve the document. ASA is in the process of developing comments based on that QAC meeting. Those comments will address subjects like these:
The documentation matrix was subject to significant discussion, and the QAC worked on a proposal to further strengthen the matrix in order to support both current and future industry ‘best practices.’
The draft is open for public comment through January 4, 2015. Comments should be delivered to
Robert McDonald
1625 K Street NW
Suite 300
Washington, DC 20006
Comments can also be emailed to Robert.CTR.McDonald@faa.gov or faxed to (202) 223-4615, Attn: Robert McDonald.
Please also send a copy of your comments to ASA, so that we can be sure that your views are reflected in the Association’s comments.
Share this:
Like this:
Filed under Uncategorized Tagged with AC 00-56A, AC 00-56B, accreditation, advisory circular, aircraft parts, comment, distributor, draft, Voluntary Industry Distributor Accreditation Program