TAC 2000 Removed from FAA Accreditation Program

The FAA announced the removal of Transonic Aviation Consultants as an accreditation organization. The FAA is also removing the associated standard (TAC 2000) from the AC 00-56B list of acceptable standards. This has been announced through an FAA “Information for Operators:” Removal of Transonic Aviation Consultants from Advisory Circular (AC) 00-56B, Voluntary Industry Distributor Accreditation Program, InFO 24004 (04/23/24). This FAA InFO provides an explanation for why this has happened.

Advisory Circular (AC) 00-56B has been revised to reflect change one. One of the most significant changes in this revision is that the list of accepted Quality System Standards and their associated Accreditation Organizations has been moved online. This makes it easier for the FAA to make changes to this list.

The FAA’s online listing of accepted Quality System Standards and their associated Accreditation Organizations no longer lists TAC-2000 nor Transonic Aviation Consultants.

What Does This Mean for Distributors?

The FAA has said that “[a]t this time, no action is recommended for owners of parts obtained from distributors who were previously accredited by Transonic.” This means that there is no FAA-recall for parts that came through those distribution channels.

The FAA has determined all existing TAC-2000 accreditations will expire on the earlier of (a) the expiration date indicated on their certificate, or (2) January 24, 2025. This means that all TAC-2000 certificates will expire (for AC 00-56B purposes) in less than 9 months, and no later than January 24, 2025.

Companies accredited to TAC-2000 will have until the expiration date to pass an audit by another authorized accreditation party, if they want to enjoy seamless listing on the AC 00-56 database.

ASA serves as the accreditation database manager. The FAA has directed ASA to notify the FAA if ASA receives a new request to add a TAC-2000-accredited distributor to the program’s database, with an accreditation date after January 23, 2024. The FAA will review these requests on a case-by-case basis and if the accreditation is acceptable, then the FAA will allow ASA to add the distributor to the database.

In all cases, the FAA has directed ASA to remove all TAC-2000-accredited-distributors when their accreditation expires or on January 24, 2025, whichever is sooner.

Want to learn more? Join us at the ASA Quality Committee meeting in June!

FAA Authorizes ASA to Perform Remote Auditing under AC 00-56B

This morning, the FAA sent a letter to ASA authorizing ASA to conduct remote audits during the Covid-19 National Emergency.

This will allow ASA-100 accredited companies to obtain audits during the coronavirus crisis, and to maintain their ASA-100 and AC 00-56B accreditation. ASA will continue to play its part in supporting safety through the aviation supply chain.

What if you are accredited to AC 00-56B through an ASACB audit under one of the ISO standards: ISO9001, AS9100, AS9110 or AS9120?  No problem.  ASACB also secured permission from the FAA to perform remote audits for AC 00-56B accreditees under one of the FAA-recognized ISO9001, AS9100, AS9110 and AS9120.  ANAB, the ANSI National Accreditation Board, has already issued permission for ASACB to perform remote audits.  Both sets of permission are necessary, because both FAA and ANAB have oversight authority over ASACB.

Background

Why did ASA need to go through this formal approval process?

FAA AC 00-56 Accreditation Supports Safety

In the 1980s and 1990s, there were industry concerns that aircraft parts distribution could be a source of inadequate parts that failed to meet safety standards. The FAA investigated a number of options, such as regulating distibutors, and decided to try setting voluntary standards and permitting third party oversight as a tool for establishing safety assurance standards to be used in distribution.

The FAA published AC 00-56 (the Voluntary Industry Distributor Accreditation Program) in 1996. The program recognized Accreditation Organizations with standards that were considered acceptable to the FAA.  One of those Accreditation Organizations was ASA, which used ASA-100 (and later was also permitted to use ISO9001, AS9100, AS9110 and AS9120).  The recognized Accreditation Organizations were permitted to audit Distributors’ compliance to the published voluntary standard. This meant that the distributor had to meet the quality standard (ASA-100, ISO9001, AS9100, AS9110 or AS9120) and also all of the elements of AC )0-56.

Since the inspection of the program, the FAA has audited ASA to gauge the success of the program.  FAA program audits have confirmed that this AC 00-56B program reflects a sound safety program that makes a positive contribution to aviation safety. The AC 00-56 Program has become an important tool to assist the FAA in ensuring aviation safety.

AC 00-56 has become a globally recognized program. There are AC 00-56 accredited distributors on every continent except Antarctica. The European Union has promulgated laws requiring Part 145 certificate holders to have procedures for accepting components. EASA 145.A.42(b)(i). EASA has interpreted this to mean that 145 organizations must evaluate their suppliers (EASA AMC1 145.A.42(b)(i) Components, ¶ (b)). AC 00-56 (and ASA-100) has been recognized as an acceptable program for supplier evaluation under European supplier control laws (EASA GM3 145.A.42(b)(i) Components, ¶ (b)(4)).  ASA has been in talks with other civil aviation authorities around the world to encourage them to adopt similar provisions recognizing the value of distributor accreditation.

AC 00-56B Requires Onsite Auditing

One of the features of the AC 00-56B program is onsite auditing of the Distributors. AC 00-56B requires onsite audits in section eight, paragraphs (b) and (f). The onsite audits are performed by qualified auditors who meet the requirements of AC 00-56B, under the coordination of Accreditation Organizations recognized in AC 00-56B.

On March 13, 2020, President Trump issued a Proclamation on Declaring a National Emergency Concerning the Novel Coronavirus Outbreak. The Proclamation recognized that “[t]he spread of COVID-19 within our Nation’s communities threatens to strain our Nation’s healthcare systems.” Since that date, many United States governors and mayors have issued correlative orders: restricting travel and requiring people to remain in their residences. Covid-19 has affected the availability and advisability of travel.

Health concerns related to Covid-19 are making onsite auditing under AC 00-56B an unnecessary risk.  Travel restrictions and state “stay-at-home” orders are making it impractical to perform onsite auditing under AC 00-56B.  Remote auditing mitigates the risks posed by onsite auditing, while providing a practical response to the need to “stay-at-home” to reduce disease transmission.

While remote auditing seems like the right response, it is still not permitted under AC 00-56B.  Thus, the industry needed a formal FAA deviation or exemption that permitted remote auditing.  ASA discussed with the FAA issuing a Notice to permit industry-wide remote auditing under AC 00-56B, but the FAA was uncomfortable with this because of the need for procedures that would ensure remote auditing was successful.  ASA petitioned the FAA to permit ASA to perform remote audits, based upon ASA’s remote auditing process and remote auditing auditor training program.

Remote Auditing the Right Way

The FAA authority is subject to ASA’s internal procedures for remote auditing, which have been developed by the audit team to help ensure an equivalent level of safety assurance. These procedures include new techniques for investigation by the audit team, and identification of objective evidence of adequate compliance.

ASA has already performed auditor training to teach the audit team how to perform remote auditing successfully.  Additional staff training is now planned for the approved procedures.

The current ASA authorization from the FAA for remote auditing is valid from April 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020.  The scope is global, so that ASA can continue to provide services to clients everywhere in the world.

Europe Formally Recognizes AC 00-56 and ASA-100

The European Union has formally recognized FAA AC 00-56 and ASA-100 as acceptable methods for supplier evaluation.

Some of you will remember that ASA was working with the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) to establish protocols for aircraft parts suppliers.  EASA examined various proposals for regulating distributors, and ultimately concluded that the FAA’s Voluntary Industry Distributor Accreditation Program was an appropriate model upon which to rely.  EASA sought comments on the proposal and ultimately issued a recommendation to the European Commission.

The first part of that recommendation was acted upon in August when the European Commission issued a new rule that required repair stations (EASA 145 organization) to

“establish procedures for the acceptance of components, standard parts and materials for installation to ensure that components, standard parts and materials are in satisfactory condition and meet the applicable requirements”  EASA 145.A.42(b)(i).

The second part of that recommendation has been implemented in ED Decision 2019/009/R.  This Decision provided guidance on what it means to establish the above procedures.  First, the guidance clarifies that “[f]or the acceptance of components, standard parts and materials from suppliers, the [] procedures should include supplier evaluation procedures.” AMC1 145.A.42(b)(i) Components, section (b).   At first glance, this appears to impose a huge new obligation on repair stations to evaluate suppliers.  But EASA has offered an easy way to meet this evaluation obligation, by relying on the existing infrastructure for supplier evaluation.

GM3 145.A.42(b)(i) Components explains how to evaluate suppliers.  It explains that a suppliers’ quality system should have certain elements.  It also permits reliance on suppliers known (through external auditing) to meet four standards that are considered acceptable: AC 00-56, ASA-100, AS/EN9120 and EASO 2012.  This means that a 145 organization can rely on a supplier that was audited to such a standard, and does not have to perform its own evaluation.  The basis for endorsing each of these standards was an analysis of each standard by EASA that found that each was in compliance with the list of elements published in this GM.

I was part of the EASA rulemaking team that performed the evaluations, so I know that EASA put a lot of effort into validating that the Voluntary Industry Distributor Accreditation Program was acceptable for use in Europe.  The entire industry of accredited distributors should be proud of this recognition, because it is the result of 25 years of commitment to safety and quality.

This is great news for the community of accredited distributors.  This verifies that aircraft parts installers who rely on AC 00-56 as an element of their supplier selection process are doing the right thing.  It also confirms that the global norms for supplier evaluation are working to enhance safety.

 

Look for tomorrow’s article on how broad is the European definition of “supplier.”

ASA in China

Next week, ASA will present at the 2016 China Aviation & MRO/Aftermarket Conference.  We will be discussing the value that AC 00-56B brings to air carriers and MROs, and explaining how Chinese air carriers can use the FAA’s accreditation database to identify foreign aircraft parts distributors with effective quality assurance systems.

We will also participate on a panel discussing how to “Improve the Information Sharing Level of Air-material Supply Chain and Optimize the Inventory Management Mode.”

According to the organizers’ website, they expect the attendance of 26 airlines from China and surrounding nations.  This should be a great opportunity for ASA members to network and build business relationships in China.

If you haven’t yet registered, and you do business (or want to do business) in China, then now is the time to register!

 

ASA Quality Assurance Commitee Meets this Sunday (June 7)

Don’t miss the ASA Quality Assurance Committee meeting, coming up in a week.  We will focus on the newly revised FAA Advisory  Circular, AC 00-56B.  This update to the Voluntary Industry Distributor Accreditation Program reflects the next evolution for our industry.  The FAA will be on-hand to answer your questions.

In addition, the agenda will feature some new changes to the program and some new tools to help support compliance (including new corrective action forms, and new guidance on self evaluation and corrective action procedures).  The afternoon will feature a look at the new ASA guidance on electro-static discharge (ESD) sensitive equipment, best practices for drop shipments, disclosure statements (like non-incident statements), and a system for labeling chemicals in your facility.

When: June 7, 2015 from 8:30 am until 3:00 pm

Where: Hyatt Regency at Gainey Ranch Resort, 7500 E Doubletree Ranch Rd, Scottsdale, AZ 85258

Cost: None!

Please register online if you intend to be there, so we can have an accurate headcount for lunch and breaks.  There is no cost to register for the ASA QA meeting!  The meeting is open to all ASA members.  If you are not an ASA member but want to attend, then please contact us, as we frequently welcome non-members to attend.

TENTATIVE MEETING AGENDA (subject to change)

 

8:30 am Welcome and Introductions; Antitrust Statement Anderson, George, J Dickstein, Committee
8:40 am ASA Announcements M Dickstein
8:50 am ASAAP Update M Dickstein
9:00 am FAA Presents AC 00-56B (Revision) Martineau
9:55 am Discussion of ASA-100 revisions necessary to support the AC 00-56 Revision J Dickstein, M Dickstein, Resto, Committee
10:15 am BREAK
10:45 am Continued discussion of ASA-100 revisions necessary to support the AC 00-56 Revision J Dickstein, M Dickstein, Resto, Committee
11:00 am ASA Corrective Action Form O’Connor
11:30 am ASA Corrective Action Letter of Interpretation J Dickstein, Lyon, O’Connor
Noon LUNCH
1:00 pm ESD Best Practices Resto
1:20 pm Drop Shipment Procedures Resto
1:40 pm OSHA’s GHS (Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labeling of Chemicals) Regulations Chen
2:10 pm Disclosure Statements J Dickstein
2:30 pm Putting Together an Education Program Related to Disclosure Statements Anderson
2:50 pm New Business/Next Meeting Committee
3:00 pm ADJOURN

 

Thank you to AerSale, Inc. for sponsoring this meeting!

FAA issues REVISED AC 00-56B – Voluntary Industry Distributor Accreditation Program

The FAA has issued the long-awaited revision to AC 00-56. This advisory circular describes the Voluntary Industry Distributor Accreditation Program (VIDAP).

This is the “B” revision, and it includes statements about a number of issues that have been part of the FAA’s understanding of the program (so they were part of the ASA implementation based on FAA input) but that had not previously been in print.  It also updates the language to a “plain language” format as well as clarifying some points that had been vague.

The updated version of the AC will be available on the main FAA website; however as of 1:00 pm today it was not yet available.  This is not unusual, and we expect that it should be available on the FAA’s main website by Monday.

However, it *IS CURRENTLY AVAILABLE* in the Regulatory and Guidance Library (RGL).   If the link to the RGL does not work then just go to rgl.faa.gov and use the search engine to find 00-56B.

The ASA Quality Assurance Committee (QAC) will meet on June 7, 2015 in Scottsdale Arizona (click here for more information on the meeting) to discuss the changes in-depth and to consider whether any additional changes to ASA-100 are necessary to reflect the changes to the AC.  The FAA is expected to present the AC at this meeting, and to be available to answer questions.

This ASA QAC meeting is part of the ASA Annual Conference.  We look forward to seeing you there!

ASA DRAFT Comments on AC 00-56B are available for member review before we submit them to the FAA

As we noted in an earlier post, AC 00-56B is out for comment.

ASA will be filing comments on this important document; we encourage everyone to review this document and to provide constructive comments to the FAA to improve the document.

Here are our DRAFT comments:  2015-01-04 – AC 00-56B Comments from ASA (DRAFT for member review). Anyone that wants to provide ASA with additional comments for consideration should get them in to us by noon on January 2, 2015.

Accreditation Alert! DRAFT AC 00-56B is out for comment!

The FAA has released for public comment AC 00-56B, which is the draft revision to the Voluntary Industry Distributor Accreditation Program (current version is AC 00-56A).

This draft FAA advisory circular (AC) describes a system for accrediting aircraft parts distributors based on compliance to a standard and certification of that compliance by FAA-acceptable accreditation organizations.  ASA has been part of this program since the beginning, and is an important FAA partner in the mission to improve aviation safety through effective management systems.

The FAA has strongly endorsed participation in the AC 00-56 program.  FAA is revising this AC to reflect the changes in regulatory requirements and industry practices since the last revision.

ASA met with its Quality Assurance Committee (QAC) on December 5 to review and examine this proposed change.  The QAC was generally supportive of the draft AC, and spent its time examining ways to further improve the document.  ASA is in the process of developing comments based on that QAC meeting.  Those comments will address subjects like these:

  • A transition mechanism for ensuring that industry has time to come into compliance with the new standards
  • Firming up an accurate description of the the relationship between the accreditation organization and the quality system standard holder
  • Firming up an accurate description of the the relationship between the accreditation organization and the FAA
  • Clarifying the definition of distributor
  • Clarifying the definition of Distributor Accreditation
  • Clarifying the definition of Quality System
  • Clarifying the definition of Traceability so it is consistent with current industry connotations
  • Using terminology that is consistent with other FAA guidance
  • Ensuring that FAA audit expectations are adequately described
  • Ensuring that FAA requirements for auditors adequately reflect current industry best practices
  • Clarifying the FAA’s changes in the quality system elements
  • Ensuring that citations to statutes and standards are correct
  • Updating the documentation matrix to reflect current standards and also to reflect the current global nature of the AC 00-56 program

The documentation matrix was subject to significant discussion, and the QAC worked on a proposal to further strengthen the matrix in order to support both current and future industry ‘best practices.’

The draft is open for public comment through January 4, 2015.  Comments should be delivered to

Robert McDonald
1625 K Street NW
Suite 300
Washington, DC 20006

Comments can also be emailed to Robert.CTR.McDonald@faa.gov or faxed to (202) 223-4615, Attn: Robert McDonald.

Please also send a copy of your comments to ASA, so that we can be sure that your views are reflected in the Association’s comments.