New Burmese Sanctions Include Sky Aviator Company

The U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Asset Control (OFAC) is issuing new sanctions against Burmese people and entities, including a business known as Sky Aviator Company.

The new sanctions are scheduled to be published tomorrow, but the sanction orders were effective as of November 8th, 2022.

OFAC sanctions typically prohibit all U.S. persons from engaging in transactions with the blocked parties. If you have a potential transaction with a blocked person or entity (blocked under OFAC sanctions), then you typically need to obtain an OFAC license (or identify an applicable OFAC general license) before you may complete the transaction.

As always, we recommend carefully performing export due diligence on every export transaction. The sanctions lists change almost every day, and many aviation companies are subject to U.S. sanctions. If you are not sure how to perform this due diligence, then we strongly recommend watching our export videos through ASA’s Webinar Series. These videos are free to ASA members and available at a nominal charge to non-members. The on-demand ASA export webinars include:

  • Export Training
  • Export Compliance – A Step-By-Step Approach (Part One: OFAC)
  • Export Compliance – A Step-By-Step Approach (Part Two: BIS)
  • Export Compliance – Licensing and Exceptions: Jason’s Favorite Licensing Exceptions (Part Three)
  • Exporting Defense Material and Complying with the ITAR (Part Four)
  • Exporting Successfully in a Challenging Global Environment (by Elena Mendez, Regional Director, The Export-Import Bank of the United States)

 

Protect Your Exports – Screen Your Business Partners, Every Time

Looking for some tips on how to ensure you remain in compliance with the US export regulations (including the re-export regulations as they apply to goods re-exported to a third country after being first exported from the United States)?

My law firm has helped build compliance programs for aviation companies for decades.  When we are helping a company build an export compliance program, we always recommend developing a mechanis to ensure that you can compare all of the relevant businesses and individuals involved in each transaction to the US Government lists that regulate exports.  Specifically, we recommend searching the business and individual names through the US Government consolidated screening list.  This list consolidates a number of different US Government lists into one screening tool: https://www.export.gov/csl-search.

We recommend searching all of the relevant parties for every transaction, every time.  The problem that arises is one of human nature battling against the company’s procedures.  If you just searched a name last week then you might decide not to search that same name again, this week.  If you’ve done business with someone for years you might feel that you have no worries about thath person.  But the lists change almost every day.  So someone who was not on the lists yesterday might have been added this morning; and if you don’t know this, then you might export to that forbidden party in violation of the law.

In order to avoid the risks that complacency can breed, we recommend to companies that they integrate an electronic search of all partners for every transactions.  This can be done by tying some aspect or your computerized system to the US Government consolidated screening list (which is designed to be a searchable database that can be integrated with outside search systems).  Make sure you tie the search to something that is enterred for EVERY transaction. Because we like to see the search done as early as possible, we sometimes recommend tying the search to the quoting system, but unless you issue a quote for EVERY transaction, this cannot be your only search.  Sometimes it also makes sense to build your system so that documents like shipping tickets and invoices cannot be generated without a completed search on the consolidated screening list.

It also helps to build a system where you must enter the names of the individuals involved in your transaction (or else have them mined from your electronic correspondence) so those names are part of the search process.

For example, imagine you get a purchase order from Cham Wings Airline.  Before responding to the purchase order, you run a search on the consolidated screening list.  A search for “Cham Wings Airline” would yield this result:

Source Specially Designated Nationals (SDN) – Treasury Department
Entity Number 21244
Type Entity
Name CHAM WINGS AIRLINES
Remarks (Linked To: SYRIAN ARAB AIRLINES)
Source List URL http://bit.ly/1I7ipyR
Source Information URL http://bit.ly/1MLgpye
Programs
  • SYRIA
Alternative Names
  • AJNEHAT AL SHAM
  • SHAM WING AIRLINES
  • CHAM WINGS
  • AL-SHAM WINGS
Addresses Al Fardous Street
Damascus
SYSaadoon Street
Baghdad
IQ8 March Street
Lattakia
SY

Hai Al Gharbi-Alraees Street
Kamishli
SY

P.O. Box 1620 Tal-Kurdi, Adra
Damascus
SY

IDs
  1. Type: Registration ID
    Number: 14683
    Country: SY

You can see from this that Cham Wings Airline is listed as a specially designated national.  The next step is typically to perform a more direct and in-depth investigation.  In this case,  Cham Wings Airline is listed as a specially designated national so we should check the Treasury Departments list of specially designated nationals.  That list is found online at https://www.treasury.gov/ofac/downloads/sdnlist.pdf.  In that list, you will find that one of the relevant entries reads:

AJNEHAT AL SHAM (a. k.a. AL-SHAM WINGS; a.k.a . CHAM WINGS (Arabic:  أجنحة الش ام); a.k. a. CHAM WIN GS AIR LINES  (A ra bic: أجن حة الشام );  f.k.a. SHAM WING AIRLINES, Al Fardous Street, Damascus, Syria; Saadoon Street, Baghdad, Iraq; 8 March Street, Lattakia, Syria; Hai Al Gharbi -Alraees Street , Kamishli, Syria; P. O. Box 1620 Tal-Kurdi, Adra, Damascus, Syria; Registration ID 14683 (Syria) [SYRIA] ( Linked To : SYRIAN ARAB AIRLINES).

This provides more information about the specially designated national in order to help distinguish it from another party with a similar name.

How common is it to find aviation companies who are listed in restricted lists like the Treasury Department’s list of specially designated nationals?  More common than you might think.  Here is a list of just some of the airlines and aviation companies included on the SDN list (this list changes, and companies go on-and-off the list, so always confirm a company remains on the SDN list – do not rely on this as your sole source of SDN information):

  • Aero Continent
  • Aero Continente
  • Aero Courier Cargo
  • Aero Express Intercontinental
  • Aero Sky One
  • Aerocaribbean Airlines
  • Aerocomercial Alas De Columbia
  • Aerocondor
  • Aerolineas Aeroamanecer
  • Aeronautica Condor
  • Aerospace Industries Organization
  • Aerospace Research Institute
  • Al-Naser Airlines
  • Al-Sham Wings
  • Avia Group LLC
  • Avia Import
  • Aviation Capital Solutions, Ltd
  • Butembo Airlines
  • Caspian Airlines
  • Cham Wings Airlines
  • Cubana Airlines
  • Dart Airlines
  • Dena Airlines
  • Empresa Cubana de Aviacion
  • Fars Air Cargo Airline
  • Hors Airlines Ltd
  • Intercontinental de Aviacion
  • International Airline Consulting
  • Iran Air
  • Khors Air
  • Kyrgyztransavia Airlines
  • Mahan Air
  • Pouya Airlines
  • Sky Blue Airlines
  • Syrian Arab Airlines
  • Ukrainian-Mediterranean Airlines
  • UM Air
  • Yasair Cargo Airline

How is FAA’s New Compliance Philosophy Related to Safety?

Many of you know that the FAA published a new compliance philosophy last summer.  The new policy, found in FAA Order 8000.373, focused on cooperative efforts to achieve compliance, rather than blind enforcement.  

Peggy Gilligan is the FAA Associate Administrator for Regulation and Safety.  She is also a lawyer.  She was part of the force behind this new policy and she explained it at the FAA/EASA Internatinal Safety Conference this week.

The aviation industry has enjoyed an impressive safety record in recent years.   But the regulators are not content to rest on their laurels.  They want to continue working on safety to make aviation ever-safer.  Most of the salient risks have already been addressed so it is harder now to identify risks to address.  In order to identify the risks, the authorities are analyzing trends that could lead to risk.  This allows them to proactively address risk before it can pose a real threat.

The regulatory authorities have been talking about the importance  of data for many years.  They attribute the industry’s recent stellar safety record to safety data collection, and effective use of that data.  Gilligan explained:

“We debuted our new philosophy on compliance. … We want to shift focus so that we and industry are working together on compliance. … We want to look for the trends that lead to systemwide risk …”

She highlighted data sharing as a key element for identifying the next generation of safety risks.  The FAA reasoning is that a cooperative environment is the best environment for encouraging voluntary data sharing.

EASA Executive Dirctor Patrick Ky agreed.  He explained:

Accidents and incidents are frequently a result of many different causal factors, so sharing data is the key to future safety.  

The new compliance program is meant to create an environment in which industry safety data can be shared freely, without fear of repercussion.  As Gilligan said on Tuesday:

“We want everyone in the system to feel free to raise their hand and say that there is something wrong”

While the FAA has decreed that safety is a cooperative effort, this does not mean that enforcement is dead.  Gilligan said “If someone is unwilling or unable to comply with safety standards then that is the highest risk in the system” and such conduct will be met with strong sanctions. 

ASA members should be particularly aware of the new compliance philosophy and what it means for the industy.  Most regulated companies have an opportunity to build a strong relationship with the the FAA, which helps to facilitate cooperation and data sharing in an effort to achieve compliance.  Unregulated distributors, on the other hand, typically do not have the same sort of strong relationships with the FAA.  

Accredited distributors rightfully feel that they are committed to safety, but FAA employees who are not familiar with the the FAA’s AC 00-56 accreditation program may not recognize that commitment.  Thus, when accredited distributors find themselves in possession of shareable safety data, then they should make sure that they take the time to educate the local FAA office about the context of their AC 00-56 quality assurance system.  This may help show that the distributor is a committed part of the aviation system-based safety process.