Late Friday Changes to the Tariff Rules – Still No Love for EU Aircraft Parts

To round out our week, this afternoon the government has issued new tariff rules. Spoiler alert – it extends certain exemptions for products of China, but it does nothing useful for aircraft parts.

Welcome to the world, revision 21 of the 2025 HTSUS!

I’ve been watching the HTSUS carefully because I am expecting to see a change excluding EU aircraft parts from the ‘product-of-the-EU’ tariffs in Chapter 99. That change has not yet been issued. The change was foreshadowed in a White House Statement that was issued a week ago (see our blog post from 8/22). But the 15% duty rate is still (currently) applied to aircraft parts that are products of the EU.

So what did we see in revision 21? Minor changes to the way that we process products of China. The China exceptions for certain goods (covered under HTSUS 9903.88.69 and 9903.88.70, and their cross-referenced subchapter III notes) are extended through November 29, 2025. These are a variety of specific goods that have been excluded from tariffs by order of the U.S. Trade Representative. The list includes certain LCD modules and main board assemblies. Most aircraft parts fall outside of this list of exempted products from China.

Keep your eyes out for 2025 HTSUS revision 22 – if that is issued next week then it might change the treatment of civil aircraft parts that are the product of the European Union.

EU Proposes Tariff Targets – Some (But Not All) Aircraft Parts Would be Affected

The European Union has published an updated list of proposed tariff targets. The title of this list is “List of the products originating in or from the United States which could be subject to possible commercial policy measures.” The link is to version 1.1 so be wary that the EU could further update this list.

The EU is seeking public comment on their proposed list of tariff targets. If the negotiations between the US and the EU do not yield an elimination of the duty imposed on all products of the EU, then the EU could implement these tariffs to impose a duty on products of the United States.

The proposed list is estimated to reflect imports from the US worth €95 billion.

The proposed list includes complete aircraft under headings 8802 (helicopters and airplanes) and 8806 (unmanned aircraft). Aircraft parts under heading 8807 are NOT included on the proposed list.

It is important to remember that many aircraft parts are NOT classified under heading 8807 because there is a more specific tariff heading that applies to them. Some aircraft parts would be affected by the proposed EU reciprocal tariffs. For example, the following aircraft parts classifications are included on the EU tariff proposal (this is a list of examples and is not meant to be exhaustive):

Tariff SubheadingDescription
40113000 new pneumatic tires, of rubber, of a kind used for aircraft
40121300 retreaded pneumatic tires, of rubber, of a kind used on aircraft
70071190toughened “tempered” safety glass, of size and shape suitable for incorporation in aircraft, spacecraft, vessels or other vehicles
85443000 ignition wiring sets and other wiring sets for vehicles, aircraft or ships
90142080 instruments and appliances for aeronautical or space navigation (excl. inertial navigation systems, compasses and radio navigational equipment)
91040000 instrument panel clocks and clocks of a similar type for vehicles, aircraft, vessels and other vehicles
94019110parts of seats used for aircraft, of wood, n.e.s
94019910 parts of seats used for aircraft, n.e.s.

The EU has explained its position in a press release.

EU Metals Rule and Certification of Aircraft Parts – Updates For Older Parts

As we wrote last month, the EU has issued new rules that are meant to help ensure compliance with Russia sanctions. These rules include a requirement for certain iron and steel articles to certify the source of the metals when these articles are imported in to the EU (to ensure the metal is not sourced from Russia). The EU has published a FAQ that provides an exception for parts produced before June 23, 2023.

As a practical matter, ASA members in the EU who are importing, and ASA members outside the EU who are exporting to the EU, need to make sure they can document source of the metal for certain articles. These iron and steel articles include, but are not limited to:

  • screws, bolts, nuts, coach screws, screw hooks, rivets, cotters, cotter pins, washers, incl. spring washers, and similar articles, of iron or steel under CN Heading 7218;
  • wire of alloy steel other than stainless, in coils (excl. bars and rods) under CN Heading 7229;
  • containers of iron or steel, for compressed or liquefied gas under CN Heading 7311;
  • air heaters and hot-air distributors under CN Heading 7322;
  • lavatory fixtures under CN Heading 7324;
  • articles of iron or steel regulated under CN Heading 7325 or 7326.

While the CN Headings are quite similar to the Harmonized Tariff Code Headings, it is wise to look directly at the European Union’s CN Headings to make sure you are properly characterizing your goods under EU law. Bear in mind also that this new rule applies to articles processed outside the EU.

If you have an article that is affected by the new rules, then you will need evidence of the country of origin of the iron and steel inputs used for the processing of the product. This must be available at the time of import into the EU.

The Exclusion

The EU regulation does not have any plain language exclusions for reasonableness, but the EU has published an exception among its “frequently asked questions” that limits application of the rule (look at question 6 of the FAQ document):

Does the application of Article 3g (1) (d) of Regulation (EU) No 833/2014 also extend to products that were manufactured or processed in a third country before 30 September 2023? Last update: 2 October 2023

The prohibition applies to imports of iron and steel products incorporating inputs originating from Russia that enter the Union as of 30 September 2023, provided that they were manufactured or produced after 23 June 2023. That is the date when the obligation for the importer to demonstrate the country of origin of the iron and steel inputs used for the processing of the product in a third country was introduced in EU law. Coupled with the almost one-year wind-down period of the prohibition itself, this should have allowed an orderly planning of imports into the Union of the relevant goods before 30 September 2023.
If the abovementioned goods are already in the territory of the Union and have been presented to customs before 30 September 2023, Article 12e applies and they can be purchased or transferred after that date (see Q3).

This means that articles that would be subject to the new EU import documentation rule, but were produced before June 23, 2023, are not required to bear the applicable documentation. As a practical matter, this is likely to mean that you will need documentation to show that the article was produced before June 23, 2023. This can include trace documentation showing commercial transactions before the date, an approval for return to service showing maintenance before the date, or an authorized release document that shows that the article was produced/approved before the date. Such documentation should be made available to prove that the article is exempt from the EU’s metals-sourcing-documentation requirement.

EU Metals Rule and Certification of Aircraft Parts

The EU has targeted Russian metals as a key element of their Russia-sanctions program. These sanctions have come to the attention of the aircraft parts industry because some EU importers are asking their export partners to certify that the metals in the aircraft parts did not come from Russia. In many cases, though, the request is NOT applicable to aircraft parts.

Executive Summary

The new EU import restriction is tied to certain categories of parts – namely certain parts in CN chapters 72 and 73. These chapters describes iron, steel, and things made from iron and steel. But the CN Code rules require you to use the most specific applicable CN code, and aircraft parts are typically going to be categorized under a more specific chapter (rather than chapters 72 or 73).

Most aircraft parts fall into CN chapters 84 (engines and their parts) or 88 (aircraft and their parts). So they are not affected by the new requirements to certify origin of the steel.

It is possible for a distributor to export chapter 72 (iron and steel) or chapter 73 (articles of iron or steel) materials to the EU (in which case the restrictions apply). If you are exporting affected material to the EU, then the importer will likely rely on you to provide evidence of the country of origin of the iron and/or steel.

To be clear, most aircraft parts are not affected by the requirement for proof that the metal did not come from Russia.

The Longer Analysis

The EU has issued a comprehensive body of sanctions against Russia for its actions in the Crimean Peninsula and for its subsequent invasion of Ukraine.

On June 23, 2023, the EU adapted additional sanctions against Russia. These amended the existing sanctions programs against Russia, which date-back to 2014 (when Russia annexed the Crimean Peninsula). While the EU has taken various steps to support Ukraine during the Russia-Ukraine conflict, some of the most important sanctions are those targeting Russia’s iron and steel industries. The newest amendments to the EU sanctions are specifically intended to address circumvention efforts.

The new sanctions apply to the import into the EU of iron and steel products where the iron or steel came from Russia. This includes materials like bar stock as well as certain finished articles. These new sanctions require the importer to confirm that the iron and/or steel did not come from Russia, which is why EU importers are asking for certifications that the materials did not come from Russia.

The newest sanctions are tied to the EU’s combined nomenclature (CN) codes. CN codes are based on the harmonized tariff code system. Why does the EU give it a different name? Because the EU has modified the harmonized tariff code system by adding additional subheadings to further distinguish imported products. But the CN code system still uses the same chapter numbers and heading numbers (and related descriptions) as the harmonized tariff code system. This will become important later in the analysis when we get to compliance strategies.

There is a very lengthy table of iron and steel products subject to the new regulations, but here are some excerpts that are potentially relevant to the aviation community:

CN CodeOfficial DescriptionExamples of Things that an Aircraft Parts Distributor Might Import into the EU that May Fall Under this Provision
7229wire of alloy steel other than stainless, in coils (excl. bars and rods)steel wires
7311containers of iron or steel, for compressed or liquefied gas (excl. containers specifically constructed or equipped for one or more types of transport)steel tanks used for compressed gasses, like oxygen or carbon dioxide
7318screws, bolts, nuts, coach screws, screw hooks, rivets, cotters, cotter pins, washers, incl. spring washers, and similar articles, of iron or steel (excl. lag screws, stoppers, plugs and the like, threaded)iron or steel fasteners
7325articles of iron or steel, cast, n.e.s.other things made of iron or steel that were produced through casting, and are regulated under harmonized tariff code 73
7326articles of iron or steel, n.e.s. (excl. cast articles)other things made of iron or steel that were not cast, and are regulated under CN chapter 73
Excerpted from Annex V to Regulation (EU) No. 2023/1214, which amended Annex XVII to Regulation (EU) No. 833/2014.

The main message you should be getting from this chart is that if you are dealing in iron or steel things that are categorized under tariff chapter 72 or chapter 73 then you need to look carefully to see if they are subject to the new EU regulations that are meant to prevent circumvention. If you are exporting these sorts of articles to the EU, then they are likely covered under the sanctions provisions and if they are then you will need to support your importer with compliance documentation.

Aircraft parts fall under a wide variety of tariff codes (CN codes in the EU). In particular, the requirements likely do not apply to aircraft parts categorized under harmonized tariff codes in chapter 84 (engines and their parts) or chapter 88 (aircraft and their parts).

Note that some additional aircraft parts CN Codes under chapter 73 include air heaters and hot-air distributors made of iron or steel (7322) and certain iron or steel lavatory fixtures (7324). Both of these headings appear in Annex XVII so each would be subject to the compliance obligations of the new rule.

Compliance Strategy

For aircraft parts distributors, the first thing to do is to ascertain whether your articles are subject to these requirements. The new amendment to the EU sanctions regulations includes a revision to Annex XVII.

Note that most aircraft parts are categorized under CN chapter 84 (engines and their parts) or Chapter 88 (aircraft and their parts) [these are not exclusive – many aircraft parts can fall under other chapters so be sure you are accurately categorizing your parts]. The new non-circumvention rule applies to certain headings found in chapters 72 and 73 only. If you know that 84 or 88 is the proper chapter for your articles, then your analysis of this particular regulations may be complete!

When we export parts from the United States, it is normal to identify a schedule B number. While the specific descriptors and subheadings can vary, the chapters and headings should be the same between the United States Schedule B (for export out of the US) and the European Union CN Codes (for import into the EU). When exporting from the United States, look at the first two numbers of your Schedule B number (this is called the “chapter”); if the number is NOT 72 or 73 then your analysis for compliance to this particular requirement is done. If the chapter is 72 or 73, then you need to continue your analysis. Look at the first four numbers of your Schedule B number (this is called the “heading”) and compare it to the numbers in Annex XVII. Make sure you are using the most up-to-date version of the Annex – the links in this article were up-to-date on the date of publication but they can be superseded! If the heading number matches a CN Code in Annex XVII, then the final step is to examine where the product was processed. The rule applies to products processed outside of the EU. If your product is described by a CN Code on Annex XVII, and it was “processed” outside of the EU, then your export to the EU will likely need to be accompanied by evidence of the country of origin of the iron and steel inputs used for the processing of the product.

Compliance For Affected CN Codes

So what do these sanctions provisions really say? The pre-existing sanctions provisions had already prohibited importing iron and/or steel articles that came from Russia or that were produced in Russia. The new provisions are meant to prevent circumvention of the sanctions.

Under the recently-amended EU sanctions provisions, it becomes illegal for persons in the EU to import or purchase iron or steel articles listed in Annex XVII (which is a list of articles regulated under CN chapters 72 or 73 ) that were processed in a third country if they incorporated iron and/or steel products originating in Russia. The Annex lists a wide variety of different forms that iron and steel can take (e.g. semi-finished articles, flat-rolled product, bar or rod stock, tubes, wires, etc.). This can be interpreted to mean that if the iron or steel came from Russia, even if it came from Russia before sanctions, then it is prohibited from import into the EU.

I know I’ve said this before, but an important distinction is that Annex XVII (as recently amended) includes articles whose CN codes begin with 72 and 73. Most aircraft parts are found in Chapters 84 (engines and their parts) or 88 (aircraft and their parts), so their CN codes begin with 84 or 88.

If you’ve got affected material that you want to export to the EU, then the operative requirement comes in the sentence that reads:

For the purposes of the application of this point, at the moment of importation, importers shall provide evidence of the country of origin of the iron and steel inputs used for the processing of the product in a third country.

Regulation (EU) No. 2023/1214 Article 1, Para. 12 amending Article 3g(1)(d) of Regulation (EU) 833/2014 (as amended)

This means that the importer of this affected material needs to get evidence of compliance (such as a certification that the iron/steel did not come from Russia).

This new requirement applies starting September 30, 2023.

US Modifies Tariffs on EU-Sourced Aircraft Fuselage, Wing, and Stabilizer Assemblies

The United States published a modification of the tariffs on aircraft and aircraft parts imported from Europe. The modification goes into effect today. The modification continues tariffs for certain aircraft coming from the EU and expands the tariffs to also include certain major assemblies (certain fuselage, wing, and stabilizer assemblies).

Tariffs are descriptions of taxes imposed on the import of goods. The tariffs are published in the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). Each tax described in such a tariffs is known as a “duty.” Duties are typically paid by the importer.

As we’d previously reported, in 2019 the U.S. Trade Representative announced a preliminary proposal to implement new tariffs on a range of European products with a significant focus on the civil aviation sector, including both parts and completed aircraft. This resulted in the imposition of certain “section 301” punitive tariffs on aircraft products from the European Union. The additional punitive tariffs are published in chapter 99.

The modification clarifies that fuselages and fuselage sections, wings and wing assemblies, horizontal stabilizers and vertical stabilizers for certain large aircraft are subject to an additional 15% duty when they are products of France or Germany (particularly under HTSUS 8803.30.00). The additional tariff is referenced under 9903.89.61. This appears to be limited to assemblies for aircraft that are already subject to the 15% duty (large aircraft from certain EU countries under HTSUS 8802.40.00) which can be found under HTSUS 9903.89.05.

The good news for many ASA members is that this new expansion does not include airplane parts, components, or sub-assemblies (e.g., aft pressure bulkheads, floor panels, seats) that are imported unattached to the described articles. The 15% duty is limited to complete assemblies meeting the tariff descriptions.

The relevant descriptive language (establishing the scope of the tariff) is found in note 21(t) from HTSUS Chapter 99:

(t) For purposes of subheading 9903.89.61:

(1) “Fuselages and fuselage sections” means: (a) the complete, tube-like structure comprising the central body portion of an airplane, including accommodations for crew, passengers, and/or cargo, whether or not containing systems, insulation, or other articles; and (b) sections of articles described in (a) that have exterior side surfaces attached to exterior top/crown and bottom/keel surfaces, whether or not designed to be pressurized, and whether or not there are additional articles attached. The term “fuselages and fuselage sections” shall not cover airplane parts, components, or subassemblies (e.g., aft pressure bulkheads, floor panels, seats) when imported unattached to the articles described in (a) and (b) of this subdivision.

(2) “Wings and wing assemblies (other than wings having exterior surfaces of carbon composite material)” means: (a) left or right handed outboard wing structures with fixed structures, whether or not also including moveable structures, having exterior surfaces of other than carbon composite material; (b) center wing boxes having exterior surfaces of other than carbon composite material; and (c) wing assemblies that combine an outboard wing structure with a fixed structure (whether or not having moveable structure) and a center wing boxes, having exterior surfaces of other than carbon composite material. The term “wings and wing assemblies (other than wings having exterior surfaces of carbon composite material)” shall not cover airplane parts, components or subassemblies when imported unattached to the articles described in in (a), (b), or (c) of this subdivision.

(3) “Horizontal and vertical stabilizers” means a horizontal or vertical stabilizer, whether or not attached to elevators or fuselage/tail cone/empennages structures. The term “horizontal and vertical stabilizers” does not cover elevators or rudders when imported unattached to a fuselage, tail cone, or empennage structure.

Such subheading shall not cover other parts of airplanes or helicopter not covered by the definitions set forth in this subdivision.

HTSUS Chapter 99, Note 21(t) (2021)

Also certain tooling from Germany under HTSUS chapters 82 and 84 remains subject to a 25% tariff and this list has been repeated in the recent modification.

This is a complicated area of the law and it is important to carefully review the applicable base tariff code, the applicable additional tariffs under chapter 99, and any exceptions (typically described in the chapter notes). For example., there may be exceptions for certain goods entered into the United States under HTSUS Chapter 98, which includes U.S.-goods-returned and articles temporarily imported into the U.S. for maintenance with the expectation of returning them to their non-U.S. owners. This area of the law is also constantly changing so be sure to look up the applicable tariffs with every import!

US Will Impose 10% Import Duty on European Planes and 25% Import Duty on Certain European Tooling

Earlier this year, the United States won a ruling in a trade case before the World Trade Organization.  The case was related to alleged subsidies of Airbus by the European Community.  The WTO ruling authorized the United States to impose duties on European imports; and a follow-on ruling dated October 2, 2019 authorized specific duty amounts.

The United States has published a list of products that will be subject to the additional duties. The list is subject to approval by the WTO but that approval is a mere formality.  Approval is expected within two weeks.

A copy of the US tariffs list (the “Final Products List”) associated with these punitive tariffs is currently available for information purposes only; however the final list will be published in the Federal Register.  This means that the currently-available list, although reasonably reliable, could possibly be changed.

The U.S. list proposes to impose a 10% duty on aircraft imported from France, Germany, Spain, or the United Kingdom.  This is limited to aircraft imported under headings

  • 8802.40.00.40 – Airplanes and other aircraft, of an unladen weight exceeding 15,000 kg, non-military, passenger transport
  • 8802.40.00.60 – Airplanes and other aircraft, of an unladen weight exceeding 15,000 kg, non-military, cargo transport
  • 8802.40.00.70 – Airplanes and other aircraft, of an unladen weight exceeding 15,000 kg, non-military, other (including passenger/cargo combinations)

At present, this list does not appear to include aircraft parts; however this could cause serious burden on US airlines and leasing companies that have already committed to accepting Airbus aircraft or other European aircraft.  If this inhibits the economic ability of companies to accept Airbus aircraft in the United States, then it is possible that the expected replacement of certain aircraft in the United States could be delayed.

The US also expects to impose a 25% duty on other named goods.  The press has made much of the high-profile categories, like wines and cheeses, but other categories are far more likely to impact the aviation community.  This includes:

  • German tooling and machinery under 8467.19.10.XX, 8467.19.50.XX, 8568.80.10.XX, 8568.90.10.XX
  • UK or German tooling and machinery under 8429.52.10.XX, 8429.52.50.XX, 8467.29.00.XX
  • German tools, as follows:
    • 8201.40.60-Axes, bill hooks and similar hewing tools (o/than machetes), and base metal parts thereof
    • 8203.20.20-Base metal tweezers
    • 8203.20.60-Pliers (including cutting pliers but not slip joint pliers), pincers and similar tools
    • 8203.30.00-Metal cutting shears and similar tools, and base metal parts thereof
    • 8203.40.60-Pipe cutters, bolt cutters, perforating punches and similar tools, (except for those with cutting part containing by weight over 0.2 percent of chromium, molybdenum, or tungsten or over 0.1 percent of vanadium), and base metal parts thereof
    • 8205.40.00-Screwdrivers and base metal parts thereof
    • 8211.93.00-Knives having other than fixed blades
    • 8211.94.50-Base metal blades for knives having other than fixed blades
    • 8467.19.10-Tools for working in the hand, pneumatic, other than rotary type, suitable for metal working
    • 8467.19.50-Tools for working in the hand, pneumatic, other than rotary type, other than suitable for metal working
    • 8468.80.10-Machinery and apparatus, hand-directed or -controlled, used for soldering, brazing or welding, not gas-operated
    • 8468.90.10-Parts of hand-directed or -controlled machinery, apparatus and appliances used for soldering, brazing, welding or tempering

These tariffs are expected to be applied as of October 18.

Major Changes Involving 8130-3 Tags

Any ASA member who has attended an ASA Board Meeting or an ASA Quality Assurance Committee meeting in the past three months knows that an important topic of discussion has been the recent FAA and EASA changes affecting 8130-3 tags.

Two significant changes in the regulations and policy have affected 8130-3s this Fall.  Both have the potential to impact the business models of distributors.  This post analyzes the two sets of changes and provides guidance for aircraft parts distributors who may be impacted by those changes.

International Agreements

The first significant change was published in the latest revision to the Maintenance Annex Guidance (revision 5). The United States has a Bilateral Airworthiness Safety Agreement (BASA) with the European Union (EU). The EU-BASA explains how the United States and the European Union will share safety duties and permit products and articles to be freely moved between jurisdictions.

The EU-BASA is interpreted by several guidance documents. One of those guidance documents is the Maintenance Annex Guidance (MAG). The MAG explains how the US and EU will share oversight of repair stations that hold authority from both jurisdictions. Under the MAG, repair stations in the US that hold EASA 145 acceptance will be subject to oversight by the FAA, and the FAA will assess compliance to both the US and the EU regulatory requirements.

In order to facilitate compliance to both standards, the MAG includes two sample supplements for the repair station manual (for US-based repair stations) or the Maintenance Organization Exposition (for EU-based repair stations). Repair stations are expected to adopt such supplements in order to ensure that their work will meet the requirements of both jurisdictions; however they are expected to be able to make changes to the sample supplement; in fact the guidance explains that:

“The applicant must customise [sic] the supplement to reflect the specific repair station operation and related procedures.”

Although the supplements are explicitly described as “samples,“ experience has shown that many FAA employees treat these samples as the only acceptable language (this was most recently re-confirmed by repair station personnel at the ASA Quality Assurance Committee Meeting in Dallas who continue to experience this phenomenon).  This is not a new phenomenon – many complaints were raised when the FAA had an advisory circular that featured sample language for the repair station’s Inspection Procedures Manual (IPM) – and ultimately the FAA found it necessary to cancel the IPM AC because safety inspectors were requiring adherence to the sample as if it were a legal requirement.  The net result in cases like this is that the “samples” become de facto regulations, because they are being enforced as if they were required by regulation. I won’t get into all of the Federal laws that are being violated when the FAA enforces a domestic record-keeping requirement that imposes new regulatory standards not previously found in US law.

With the Supplement “samples” being treated as if they were requirements, we find a number of requirements being imposed that are not required under US law, and a few that are not required under either US law or EU law (thus making MAG rev. 5 a source of brand new quasi-legal obligations).

The most significant elements for distributors are found in the MAG rev. 5 requirements for acceptance of new parts.  The language that applies to US based repair stations (who need the supplement to retain their EASA privileges) includes this text:

New components must be traceable to the OEM as specified in the Type Certificate (TC) holder’s Parts Catalogue and be in a satisfactory condition for installation. A release document issued by the OEM or Production Certificate (PC) holder must accompany the new component. The release document must clearly state that it is issued under the approval of the relevant AA under whose regulatory control the OEM or PC holder works.

The acceptance language that applies to standard parts provides an exception for those parts, but PMA parts enjoy no such exception which means that independent PMA parts (which are typically are not included in the type certificate holder’s parts catalogue) appear to be unacceptable (violating EASA standards and conflicting with the existing Technical Implementation Procedures).

More importantly, all new components will have to be accompanied by a “release document issued by the OEM or Production Certificate (PC) holder.”  Today, most 8130-3 tags are issued by the FAA (usually through its designees).  This provision would cause the rejection of existing FAA 8130-3 tags because they were not issued by the OEM or Production Certificate holder (instead, until now, they have always been issued by the FAA, directly or through designees).  This could have a tremendous impact on existing inventories, which would not meet the acceptance requirements described in the supplement even if they were accompanied by 8130-3 tags issued by the FAA.

The FAA and EASA have agreed to delay the implementation of MAG rev. 5 until March 29, 2016.  This was meant to permit time for manufacturers to start issuing 8130-3 tags for new parts.

8130-3 Tag Regulations

Under the new regulations, a production approval holder (PAH) will be permitted to issue its own 8130-3 tags. These tags will be known as “authorized release documents.”  This privilege will be permissive and not mandatory, so some manufacturers may choose not to issue authorized release documents.  The FAA has issued guidance that says that once a production approval holder has set up a system for issuing authorized release documents, the production approval holder will be required to surrender its ODA privileges or other designated privileges that permit issuance of an FAA 8130-3 tag.  Thus, for manufacturers, the choice of issuing 8130-3 tags under the manufacturer’s own authority or obtaining them through designees will be an ‘either-or’ choice, without the opportunity to use both systems.

The FAA implies that these documents can be used for export purposes, by explaining that when an authorized release document is issued for export purposes, the production approval holder must follow the procedures specified in § 21.331 and must comply with the responsibilities of exporters specified in § 21.335.  One of the many problems with these authorized release documents is that although they appear to now be potentially acceptable for European repair stations, our bilateral agreement with the rest of the world all require FAA-issued 8130-3 export tags.  So manufacturer’s authorized release documents would not meet the requirements of our other bilateral agreements.  In addition, the BASA Technical Implementation Procedures (TIP) with the EU anticipates that EASA can expect FAA-issued 8130-3 tags (it repeatedly uses language explaining that the FAA must certify facts on the 8130-3 tag, such as in section 5.1.6(a)(1) for TSOAed articles).

On December 17, the FAA published a correction to the final rule that explained that PAHs are permitted to start issuing 8130-3 tags as early as January 4, 2016. This is specifically intended to permit PAHs to issue 8130-3 tags to support the new requirements for 8130-3 tags that are needed for domestic repair stations that possess EASA privileges (the preamble to the rule specifically mentions MAG rev. 5 as a motivating factor for the correction).

There are already manufacturers who rely on their own certificates of conformity and do not obtain 8130-3 tags for domestic transactions.  We have spoken with manufacturers who are not sure whether they will begin issuing 8130-3 tags because of some of the problems and limits associated with the PAH-authorized release document policy; so distributors may be unable to obtain PAH authorized release documents for some parts; and will likely have extreme difficulties obtaining PAH authorized release documents for existing inventory.

How Big of an Issue is this in the United States?

According to EASA, there are 1474  valid repair stations in the US with EASA privileges (EASA Table dated Nov. 12, 2015 – this does not include ‘not valid’ and invalid EASA repair station approvals in the US).  This is about one-third of the domestic US repair stations; but as a practical matter, it is nearly all of the US repair stations that service commercial aircraft customers.  This means that most repair stations that purchase parts from ASA members will be affected by the MAG rev. 5 requirements.  Because it is easier for FAA employees to simply enforce the MAG rev. 5 sample as if it were a requirement, we should expect most of these repair stations to adopt supplements that are consistent with the language of MAG rev. 5.  This will have a very significant affect on the business of aircraft parts distribution.

What Does This Mean for Distributors?

Distributors should expect to have problems selling aircraft parts without 8130-3 tags after March 31, 2016.  This could result in devalued inventory as a consequence of the FAA’s actions (There are months yet to go before this implementation date so ASA can do little to predict, today, what the actual devaluation will be).

The authorities (FAA and EASA) have agreed that for parts released by production approval holders before April 1, 2016, those parts will not be expected to be accompanied by 8130-3 tags.  The fact that an aircraft part produced by a PAH is in a distributor’s inventory as of that date is prima facie evidence that the part was released by the production approval holder before that date.  This means that aircraft parts in a distributors inventory as of close of business on March 31, 2016 or start of business on April 1, 2016 are grandfathered from the provisions of MAG rev. 5 (although, of course, parts intended to be used on European-registered aircraft will be expected to meet the requirements of the BASA TIP).  Distributors may wish to find a way in their inventory database systems to identify all parts held as of COB March 31, 2016 in order to be able to certify that the part was released by the production approval holder before April 1, 2016.

What Can You Do to Make Things Better?

1) Communicate with your repair station customers and ask them to ensure that their EASA Supplements permit them to accept parts without 8130-3 tags (e.g. parts with a manufacturer C of C) consistent with US policy in documents like FAA AC 00-56B.  Nothing in either US or EU law should prevent them from being able to receive a demonstrably airworthy part in new condition under their FAA 145 privileges and then issuing a single release certificate for their domestic U.S. customers.

2) Communicate with your repair station customers and ask them to ensure that their EASA Supplements are consistent with EASA regulations instead of using the MAG rev. 5 language, which adds limits that are not required under EASA regulations;

3) Communicate with your repair station customers and ask them to ensure that their EASA Supplements accept all 8130-3 tags that are acceptable by European 145s under the BASA Technical Implementation Procedures;

4) Communicate with your manufacturer business partners and encourage them to release their parts with 8130- 3 tags;

5) To the greatest extent possible, obtain 8130-3 tags for parts.  Even though they are not required by law in the US, the FAA is going to impel repair stations to reject parts that do not have 8130-3 tags, which will make the 8130-3 tag a de facto requirement for selling to repair stations.

6) Share your thoughts!  ASA is eager to hear your thoughts about potential problems and solutions.