BIS Expands Sanctions Against Russia and Belarus

Yesterday, BIS announced its latest round of sanctions against Russia and Belarus arising from Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. We have written about previous BIS sanctions against Russia and Belarus over the past several weeks. The previous rounds of sanctions imposed, among other things, a license requirement for all articles controlled under CCL categories 3 through 9 under a new § 746.8 of the EAR.

The latest sanctions expand that license requirement under § 746.8 to now include CCL categories 0 through 2 as well. Thus, any item specified under any ECCN is subject to an export license requirement. Although this may not seem like a broad expansion of the licensing requirements as far as aircraft parts distribution is concerned, it is important to note that many bearings are controlled under CCL 2 and certain seals, gaskets, sealants and fuel bladders specially designed for aircraft or aerospace are controlled under CCL 1. These items now require a license to Russia or Belarus.

The sanctions also further limit the availability of License Exception AVS paragraphs (a) and (b) to aircraft registered in, owned or controlled by, or under charter or lease by Belarus or a national of Belarus (bringing it in line with limitations on the exception already applicable to Russia and Russian nationals). We can therefore not rely on License Exception AVS–a commonly used license exception–to support a Russian or Belarusian aircraft.

The United States continues to impose additional sanctions as a result of the war in Ukraine. We will keep members updated as new sanctions that affect distributors arise.

New Sanctions Against Belarus

The United States is issuing new sanctions against Belarus. In practice, they will prevent – or make very difficult – most aircraft parts transactions in support of commercial aviation in Belarus. In fact, they will generally prevent a wide range of transaction in goods that would be exported to Belarus.

The new sanctions will probably limit transactions with Belarusian air carriers like Belavia.

The Federal Register Notice will begin with the phrase “In response to Belarus’s substantial enabling of the Russian Federation’s (Russia)’s further invasion of Ukraine …” so there is no question about why these sanctions are being issued. And this also suggests that we can expect Belarus to be treated to a similar level of sanctions as Russia. You can see this being implemented through the addition of Belarus directly to the new Russia-specific sanctions programs.

Here is an outline of the new sanctions leveled against Belarus

  • General licensing requirement for most exports
  • Limit on the use of license exceptions
  • Added to country groups D:2 and D:4
  • New MEU sanctions
  • New MEIU sanctions

Discussion of Belarusian Sanctions Programs

Recently, the US Government added a new regulation at 15 C.F.R. § 746.8. This new regulations applied a broad set of sanctions against Russia. In summary, anyone exporting aircraft parts (and many other BIS-controlled articles) now requires a license to export those goods to Russia (a license that will likely be denied). That same set of sanctions has been applied against Belarus. The new rule will apply 15 C.F.R. § 746.8 to Belarus, as well as to Russia.

In practice this means:

  1. Aircraft parts that are controlled under an CCL categories 3 through 9 (like ECCN 9A991) will need a BIS license to be exported to Belarus or to Russia;
  2. There is a presumption of denial for most such licenses;
  3. Generally, license exceptions will not be permitted to be used, BUT a short list of exceptions can be used in specific cases; and
  4. Among the license exceptions permitted to be used, most of them cannot be used to export aircraft parts to Belarusian and/or Russian customers.

This license requirement is the most important change for aircraft parts exporters. It means that you cannot export aircraft articles to Belarus (nor to Russia) without a BIS license, and because of the presumption of denial it will be difficult to obtain such a license.

Licensing and License Exceptions

For those who want to pursue a BIS license for exports to Belarus or Russia, the U.S. government has opened the door to license sin support of “safety of flight,” but the burden will be on the applicant to demonstrate that the transaction will not benefit the Russian or Belarusian government or defense sector. The presumption of denial, though, makes any license application an uphill battle, so we recommend using a law firm with experience in export licensing to pursue such a license (yes, a firm like ours).

The license exceptions that typically can be available are mostly forbidden. Only a short list of exceptions is available and for most civil aircraft article transactions there are limitations that will prevent them from being used to support Belarusian aircraft. The available license exceptions look like this:

  • TMP: Temporary exports for use by the news media only.
  • GOV: exports in support of the US government.
  • TSU: software updates for US-related companies.
  • BAG: for personal baggage.
  • AVS: this applies to aircraft parts but it excludes exports for aircraft registered in D:1 nations, or owned/operated by nationals of D:1 nations. Both Belarus and Russia are D:1 nations.
  • ENC: encryption hardware and software for US-related companies.
  • CCD: applies to consumer devices like computers, TVs, phones and cameras.

If one of these license exceptions looks like it might apply to your fact pattern then read the regulation and get legal help before using it! There are plenty of details that potentially limit the applicability of each of these license exceptions. Note that the loopholes that are left are generally for supporting non-Belarusian parties who happen to be in Belarus; for example AVS may permit exports for an aircraft that is AOG in Belarus as long as the aircraft has no other connections to Belarus or Russia.

BIS maintains country groups in order to better manage sanctions programs and to limit exceptions. Belarus has been added to country groups D:2 and D:4 for additional nuclear and missile technology restrictions. Belarus was also removed from country group A:4, which was a nuclear suppliers group.

Belarus has been added to the MEU restrictions of 15 C.F.R. § 744.21 and the MEIU restrictions of 15 C.F.R. § 744.22. This imposes an additional restriction on exports for military end uses (or destined for military end users), including military intelligence end use and end users.. Remember that the list of military end users typically includes private companies who represent a “threat of diversion” to military end use, so the coverage of this rule is broader than just strict military entities.

Implementation is Now

The Belarusian sanctions Federal Register notice is expected to be published on March 8. It was posted for public inspection on the evening of March 2, though. It is expected to be effective for all transactions beginning on the public inspection date of March 2, 2022.

BIS Issues New Regulations Implementing Sanctions Against Russia

We have written over the last few days about the implementation of new rounds of sanctions against Russia. Effective February 24, and to be published March 3 in the Federal Register, BIS has finalized its own regulation implementing sanctions measures against Russia. The goal of the sanctions is to restrict Russia’s access to items it needs to project power and includes “sophisticated technologies designed and produced in the United States, as well as certain foreign-produced items that contain or are based on U.S.-origin technology.” These controls primarily target Russia’s defense, aerospace, and maritime sectors. The following is a brief summary of BIS’s sanctions implementation.

ECCN License Requirements

The most significant change for aircraft parts distributors appears in new § 746.8(a)(1) of the EAR, which imposes a license requirement on any item subject to an ECCN in categories 3 through 9 of the CCL. This would obviously include common industry ECCNs like 9A991.d and 7A994, as well as more tightly controlled CCL 7 and CCL 9 ECCNs. Further, license applications are subject to a presumption of denial, making licenses difficult to obtain. The preamble to the regulation specifically cites ECCN 9A991.d as an example of an item subject to a low level of control that did not previously require an export license to Russia that will now require a license.

However, two notes to this general policy are important to aircraft parts distributors. First, BIS will apply a case-by-case review policy to export license applications intended to ensure inter alia safety of flight. Second, License Exception AVS paragraph (b) remains available to overcome the new license requirement. AVS paragraph (b) provides:

Equipment and spare parts for permanent use on an aircraft, when necessary for the proper operation of such aircraft, may be exported or reexported for use on board an aircraft of any registry, except an aircraft registered in, owned or controlled by, or under charter or lease to a country included in Country Group D:1, Cuba, or a national of any of these countries.

Note that Russia is a D:1 country, so AVS would not be allowed for Russian registered, owned, or operated aircraft, but non-Russian operators in AOG situations in Russia may be able to be supported under this exception.

This license exception and case-by-case review policy should allow distributors to continue to serve some civil operators in Russia (again, with the note that to support a Russian operator will require an export license), but we caution anyone seeking to use such an exception to consult with their export compliance counsel.

Additional Restrictions

Foreign Direct Product

The sanctions create two new “foreign direct product”(FDP) rules: one applicable to Russia as a whole and one applicable to Russian military end users. These restrictions apply to the export or re-export of foreign-produced items that are the product of U.S.-controlled technology or software. In the case of the FDP rule applying to Russia broadly, the relevant foreign produced products are those produced from controlled technology or software in CCL 3-9, and are subject to comparable license requirements, presumptions, and exceptions as the ECCN rule above. In the case of FDP to military end-users, all CCL chapters are restricted and no license exceptions are available (with certain very case-specific exceptions).

Expanded Military End-Use and Military End User Control

The sanctions expand the restrictions on items that can be exported without a license to Russian military end users and end-uses. Previously, those items listed in Supplement No. 2 to part 744 required a license for export to a military end use or military end user. The sanctions expand the ECCNs that require a license to a Russian military end use/user to all items subject to the EAR except food and medicine designated EAR99 and items subject to ECCNs 5A992.c and 5D992.c (and even those not to Russian government end users or state-owned enterprises). In short, practically every item subject to the EAR will require a license for export to a Russian military end user or for a Russian military end-use, and those licenses will be presumptively denied.

Russian MEU Listed Entities to the Entity List

Finally, BIS transitioned 45 Russian entities from the Military End User (MEU) list (Supplement No. 7 to part 744) to the Entity List (Supplement No. 4 to part 744; 15 C.F.R. § 744.16) to reflect the heightened restrictions and licensing requirements reflected by the expanded military end-user and end-use controls described above. BIS also added and modified certain entities.

Conclusion

This is a highly complex and dynamic regulatory environment. The baseline presumption is that all aerospace exports to Russia of virtually anything subject to the BIS regulations will require a license. For the purposes of civil aviation, license exception AVS (to non-Russian aircraft) and case-by-case license review may offer some limited relief, but make sure to consult with your export compliance counsel before undertaking any new transactions. Also remember that the sanctions and regulations continue to change: what was a legal export yesterday may not be legal tomorrow. Keep your eye on this space for more updates.

More Russia Sanctions are on the Way

Last night, President Biden spoke with President Zelenskyy of Ukraine. In the public statement issued after the call, President Biden said that today he would be “meeting with the Leaders of the G7, and the United States and our Allies and partners will be imposing severe sanctions on Russia.”

Earlier this week we described the first round of sanctions, which were targeted at the “Covered Regions” in Eastern Ukraine. The next round of sanctions will probably described businesses and people in Russia with whom business is restricted. One of the areas of potential sanctions that is being discussed in Washington is specific export restrictions on aerospace products and articles.

In addition, Janet Yellen has signed a determination that limits financial transactions with Russia.

ASA members should be cautious about transactions with Russia and in particular should watch carefully for more export sanctions that may more directly target Russia.

UPDATE: This afternoon (Feb. 24th) President Biden announced that the United States and the G-7 will be imposing additional sanctions on Russia. Based on a recent background statement by a senior administration official, it appears likely that these will include export restrictions. As soon as the details become available, we will be posting a blog article about them.

Also, the Treasury Department issued a new directive that will restrict certain transactions with the following businesses:

x CREDIT BANK OF MOSCOW PUBLIC JOINT STOCK COMPANY
x GAZPROMBANK JOINT STOCK COMPANY
x JOINT STOCK COMPANY ALFA-BANK
x JOINT STOCK COMPANY RUSSIAN AGRICULTURAL BANK
x JOINT STOCK COMPANY SOVCOMFLOT
x OPEN JOINT STOCK COMPANY RUSSIAN RAILWAYS
x PUBLIC JOINT STOCK COMPANY ALROSA
x PUBLIC JOINT STOCK COMPANY GAZPROM
x PUBLIC JOINT STOCK COMPANY GAZPROM NEFT
x PUBLIC JOINT STOCK COMPANY ROSTELECOM
x PUBLIC JOINT STOCK COMPANY RUSHYDRO
x PUBLIC JOINT STOCK COMPANY SBERBANK OF RUSSIA
x PUBLIC JOINT STOCK COMPANY TRANSNEFT

Exporting under Russia-Ukraine Sanctions

Recently, we have had several questions from members regarding export of aircraft parts to Russia and the Ukraine. As most readers no doubt know, the United States and the EU, in response to the conflict in eastern Ukraine, have imposed various economic sanctions on certain persons and businesses in Russia.  When sanctions like these are imposed, those companies doing business with customers in Russia and Ukraine wisely want to know whether and what type of affect these sanctions may have on their business.

Questions regarding business relations in Russian and Ukraine typically take one of two forms: The first, can I do business with the customer at all?  The second, can I export this particular part to the customer?

To answer these questions, we first need to know what sanctions have been imposed and to whom they apply. We then need to recall our basic export compliance principles and apply those principles to determine whether the part itself can be exported.  Those who have attended ASA workshops in the past may recognize these steps as part of the process of export compliance.

The United States, through the Treasury Department, has issued several rounds of sanctions directed at specific industries and parties.  For the most part, the targeted industries have been companies in the Russian financial and energy sectors, while the individuals mainly officials and individuals with ties to Vladimir Putin.

However, companies in the financial and energy sectors are the only ones that have been targeted.  Importantly, Avia Group and Avia Group Nord, business aviation groups, were also targeted with U.S. sanctions.  This means that although not yet a focal point, the aviation industry can by targeted if the United States deems it necessary, and so is a good reminder that exporters of aircraft parts need to be aware.  The Treasury Department maintains an up to date list of Ukraine-related sanctions on its website.

Although it appears that the Russian aviation sector has not been highly targeted by the United States yet, these sanctions illustrate the importance of knowing your customer. Further, simply because the United States has not sanctioned an organization does not mean they may not be sanctioned by another body.  For instance, the EU recently issued sanctions against Dobrolet, a low-cost Russian carrier.  If you are based in the the EU, you should review the European Union’s restrictive measures in force to ensure you remain compliant with EU sanctions.

As our industry well knows, wealthy entities and individuals, such as those named in sanctions, frequently own or operate their own aircraft.  Given the wealth and high-ranking status of individuals and companies named, it is  important to review the Treasury Department Office of Foreign Asset Control’s Specially Designated Nationals list.  Furthermore, it is important to take this step with every transaction, because new individuals and entities can be added at any time, whether announced as a new round of sanctions or not.

Once we have determined whether sanctions apply to our prospective customer, we can rely on our export compliance program to take us the rest of the way.  The exporter must determine whether the article it plans to export is ITAR or EAR controlled.  Once the appropriate export regime is determined the exporter must determine whether an export license is required for the particular part or whether any license exceptions apply.  If a license is required, the exporter should apply as usual.  Be aware that both the State Department DDTC and the Commerce Department BIS may deny export license applications for high-tech items that could contribute to Russian military capability.  In most cases, however, articles for civil aviation may still be exported.

The highly publicized nature of these sanctions rightfully causes many companies to hesitate before undertaking an export transaction to the listed countries.  This hesitation is appropriate, given the already complex nature of export compliance. But these delays can also help the exporter to ensure that the transaction is undertaken correctly and legally.

The good news is that an effective export compliance system will enable you to easily comply with whatever sanctions and restrictions are enacted.  An effective compliance system should find the exporter following the same steps, reviewing the same lists, and performing the same analyses with every export transaction.  An export compliance program that is second nature to the exporter’s employees will ensure that no matter what sanctions are issued, or against whom, your company will remain compliant. Our law firm has helped many companies establish effective export compliance programs.  If you have questions regarding compliance, please feel free to contact us.