Hazmat Training Records – What is the Burden?

The FAA is seeking comments on the burden associated with hazmat training records. This information will typically be shared with OMB, which manages recordkeeping obligations.

The FAA mandates that certificate holders, like airlines and repair station, must obtain hazmat training and they must retain records of such training. The FAA’s guidance suggests that repair station must create training manuals for their hazmat training obligation. E.g. FSIMS Vol. 6, Chap. 9, Sec. 2, Para. 6-1653(F). Repair stations are also required to obtain hazmat training and document that training.

The government periodically collects information on record-keeping obligations. This is an opportunity to file comments about the accuracy of their estimates on time consumed in record-keeping.

ASA filed comments challenging the current estimates, based on the proposition that hazmat recordkeeping typically takes more time than the estimates provide (mc0-o5c0-79jk).

DOT Expands SMS to Include Hazmat Safety

A new regulation has included hazmat safety within the scope of provisions expected to be addressed in an air carrier’s SMS. This could be the first step in a steady expansion of the scope of the FAA’s SMS regulation.

The FAA’s SMS regulation applies to operators and it was originally published to help them manage aviation safety issues. The SMS regulation is found in the FAA’s Part 5 regulations.

The FAA pledged to limit their oversight of SMS to only aviation safety issues under the FAA’s own regulations. If an air carrier chooses to extend their SMS to a safety issue that is not an aviation safety related activity, then the FAA would only conduct oversight of the SMS activities related to the carrier’s aviation operations conducted in accordance with the provisions of part 121. See Safety Management Systems for Domestic, Flag, and Supplemental Operations Certificate Holders, 80 FR 1307, 1311-12 (Jan. 8, 2015). In this pledge, the FAA offered examples such as security and occupational safety and health issues. Id.

There is good reason to limit the scope of the SMS. Air carrier resources are not unlimited, and in order to make SMS useful, there has to be a clear scope to the SMS, so the air carrier is not diverting safety resources to projects that do not add aviation safety value, because those projects had been identified within the “scope” of the SMS.

The Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) has a regulation that prescribes the requirements that apply to the transportation of hazmat aboard aircraft (49 C.F.R. 175.1 et seq.). PHMSA has just added text to that regulation that says:

“(e) In addition to the requirements of this part, air carriers that are certificate holders authorized to conduct operations in accordance with 14 CFR part 121 are also required to have a Safety Management System that meets the conditions of 14 CFR part 5 and is acceptable to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) Administrator.”

Hazardous Materials: Harmonization With International Standards, 89 FR 25434, 25488 (April 10, 2024)

For clarity, the PHMSA explained that their intent in adding this regulatory language was to ensure that this added reference would cause air carriers to add hazmat safety to their SMS focus.

“PHMSA expects that adding a reference to these requirements in the HMR will provide additional clarity for Part 121 aircraft operators, particularly with SMS applicability to the acceptance and transport of hazardous materials at the aircraft level”

Hazardous Materials: Harmonization With International Standards, 89 FR 25434, 25459 (April 10, 2024)

To be clear, Part 121 does require hazmat training, but the direct regulation of hazmat carriage is covered outside of Part 121 (in Title 49). So this is an expansion of the stated scope of SMS for air carriers. If the U.S. Department of Transportation can expand the scope once, then they can do it again.

This is a particular concern when you consider that the FAA is working on finalizing a proposed rule that will expand SMS to other parties in the aviation industry. What other foci will be added to SMS? Could the Department of Labor add OSHA to SMS Part 5, even though OSHA rules were originally intended to be excluded from Part 5?

UN 3548: New Rules for Articles Containing Miscellaneous Dangerous Goods (e.g. articles with hydraulic fluid)

For those of you who’ve taken our hazmat shipping class, you know that when there is a conflict between the United States rules and the ICAO/IATA rules, if the United States forbids the shipment then you must follow the United States’ prohibition. A recent conflict between US rules and ICAO technical instructions just got resolved by a Final Rule published yesterday.

This new rule permits the transport by air of articles like aircraft landing gear parts that contain hydraulic fluid.

This issue has arisen for UN 3548 (Articles Containing Miscellaneous Dangerous Goods, N.O.S.) and also UN 3538 (Articles Containing Non-Flammable Non-Toxic Gas, N.O.S.). The shipping provisions for UN 3538 and UN3548 forbid shipment by both passenger aircraft and by cargo aircraft. This prohibition can be found in both the U.S. regulations and the ICAO (IATA) Technical Instructions. But there is a special provision in the ICAO Technical Instructions that permits shipping the goods by air if the only hazardous material in the article is either (1) an environmentally hazards substance, (2) a division 2.2. gas with no subsidiary hazards, (3) a “section II” lithium battery and an environmentally hazards substance, or (4) a “section II” lithium battery and a division 2.2. gas with no subsidiary hazards.

In each such case, the special provision number must be declared in the shipper’s declaration for dangerous goods and there is a packing instruction that must be followed:

  • Packing Instruction 222 for Articles Containing Non-Flammable Non-Toxic Gas, N.O.S. (per Special provision A225)
  • Packing Instruction 975 for Articles Containing Miscellaneous Dangerous Goods, N.O.S. (per Special provision A224)

These two special provisions permitted shipment by air (outside the U.S.) where the shipment appeared to be forbidden. Each special provisions was intended to apply to the transport of large articles containing a non-flammable, non-toxic gas or environmentally hazardous substances only under the specified conditions.

A conflict arose because the United States did not have these same special provisions, so shipment by air of UN 3538 or UN 3548 was simply forbidden in the United States. That issue was remedied with the publication (yesterday) of a final rule adding special provisions A224 and A225 to the United States regulations (and applying each of them to the applicable hazmat proper shipping name and UN number). So now these two UN numbers can be shipped by air (under the limited permissions of the two special provisions).

Are You Shipping Hazmat? Also, Bonus Video on Shipping Lithium Batteries

Aircraft parts are full of hazmat:

  • Batteries;
  • Squibs;
  • Self-inflating emergency equipment;
  • Compressed gas tanks;
  • Passenger service units with oxygen generators;
  • Residual fuel in a component (even if it is just a small amount);

These are just a few examples of the sort of hazmats that aircraft parts distributors see every day. I have received calls from ASA members whose business models did not involve hazmats; but then they received an air carrier inventory with “extra items.” Extra items that included hazmats.

If you receive unwanted or unexpected hazmat from a business partner, you cannot simply return it without thought. You need to make sure that even a return shipment meets the requirements of the hazmat rules. Civil penalties for getting this wrong can easily exceed $100,000. This means that you need to have trained personnel to identify hazmats, and you need to have trained personnel to classify, package, label and ship the package to wherever it needs to go (the training is required and defined by regulation).

Our next hazmat training class is scheduled for October 4-5, 2022. ASA members get a discount and there is also an additional early registration discount. The deadline for the early registration discount is September 13, 2022.

Our training is offered as a live, online class. You can take the class from the comfort of your desk without any travel. Because it is a live class, we can answer your questions in real-time to make sure you are getting everything you need from the class.

Lithium Batteries

If you are shipping lithium batteries, then you may want to check out our free video on shipping lithium batteries. This video is posted on Youtube.

Make sure you are watching the video for the correct year! We started posting these videos in 2021 and each year we post an updated video reflecting the changing rules surrounding lithium battery shipments. The year is part of the title.

Also please note that the training video is meant to be a supplement to our training class. It is a useful guide for shipping lithium batteries but it is not stand-alone training and it does not take the place of training that meets all of the regulatory requirements.

Shipping Lithium Batteries – Updated for 2022

Lithium batteries can be complicated to ship by air. Most people use the IATA Dangerous Goods Regulations but the lithium battery packing instructions in the IATA book are not like most of the other packing instructions.

To make it easier to ship lithium batteries by air, we’ve prepared a video that goes over the special packaging, marks, labels, and documentation commonly required when shipping lithium batteries by air.

There are changes for 2022 – including the elimination of section II options for shipping batteries under packing instruction (PI) 965! Only section IA and section IB remain in PI 965. But there are still section II instructions in other packing instructions (like PI 966 and PI 967 for batteries packed with and in equipment). So the whole process is just that much more complicated.

As always, I will warn you that the video is only a supplement to our hazmat training. There are required training elements that are covered in the class and are not addressed in the video. But our next class will be held April 19-20, 2022 and you can find out more here. [if you don’t see this until after April 19 then feel free to sign up for our next class]

You can watch the video on youtube or just watch here on our site:

Lithium Battery Shippers Video

“Dangerous Goods in Articles:” The Proper Shipping Name is ALMOST Ready to Be Used in the United States

I was looking at the list of major changes for next year’s IATA Dangerous Goods Regulations. I noticed that the major changes include expanded reliance on the new proper shipping name “Dangerous Goods in Articles.”

As a reminder, Hazmat shippers in the United States should NOT YET be using the proper shipping name “Dangerous Goods in Articles.”

This is a technical variance in what the law allows, but current use of the term in the United States as if it were a hazmat proper shipping name is not permitted, and could become the subject of an enforcement action.

The way that U.S. hazmat regulations work, is that you need to comply with the US regulations, for example, when you choose a proper shipping name for your package, it must be an authorized name. Right now, “Dangerous Goods in Articles” is not an authorized proper shipping name under U.S. law.

You are permitted to rely on the ICAO Technical Instructions when shipping things by air (except where prohibited). When US law permits reliance on an alternative source, that source must typically be incorporated by reference in the U.S. legal structure, which means that typically a specific edition or revision must be referenced. The specific edition of the ICAO Technical Instructions that is currently incorporated by reference is the 2019-2020 edition, which is incorporated at 49 C.F.R. § 171.7.

In the 2021-2022 revision, ICAO published a proper shipping name that will be quite useful to the aviation community: “Dangerous Goods in Articles.” The problem is that IATA immediately included this in the 2021 IATA Dangerous Goods Regulations, but the United States did not immediately incorporate the new ICAO edition by reference.

It is worthwhile to remind the reader that despite bearing the name “regulations” in the title, the IATA Dangerous Goods Regulations are not actually regulations. They reflect a ‘field manual’ for compliance, and they are based on the ICAO Technical Instructions.

The United States regulations still reference the 2019-2020 edition of the ICAO Technical Instructions as the edition that is currently permitted to be used for compliance.

The United States is taking steps to incorporate by reference the 2021-2022 edition (which includes the new term). The Notice of Proposed Rulemaking that will accomplish this was published on August 10, 2021. If you have a comment to share, then you may wish to submit it to the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration. The proposed rule is open for comments through October 12, 2021.

As far as timing goes, there is a good chance that the final rule incorporating by reference the 2021-2022 ICAO Technical Instructions will be published by the end of 2021. And when it is, we should be authorized to use “Dangerous Goods in Articles” when shipping by air. That same U.S. rule making project is also expected to add “Dangerous Goods in Articles” to the United States’ list of proper shipping names in the hazardous materials table (permitting more general use of the term). But that step hasn’t been taken yet.

So please, be patient and wait. The new proper shipping name is coming!

Looking for more hazmat compliance advice? We will be teaching a live, online, hazmat class for shippers of aviation goods next month (October 6-7). See our hazmat training webpage for more details!

Shipping Lithium Batteries

Lithium batteries can be complicated to ship by air. Most people use the IATA Dangerous Goods Regulations but the lithium battery packing instructions are not like most of the other packing instructions.

To make it easier to ship lithium batteries by air, we’ve prepared a video that goes over the special packaging, marks, labels, and documentation commonly required when shipping lithium batteries by air.

You can watch the video on youtube or just watch here on our site:

This is not a stand-alone module; this video training is meant to be a supplement to the full hazmat certification training that we offer. If you haven’t taken that training, then we recommend attending one of our classes so you can understand the scope of your compliance obligations, and then using this video to review how to follow the IATA instructions for shipping lithium batteries (in particular).

Free Online Hazmat Webinar – Tuesday!

Hazmat shippers need to be specially certified; but everyone needs to be able to identify it to make sure it is referred to the correctly-certified shippers – this includes personnel who handle parts and it includes sales personnel who need to know when hazmat may require special handling in order to reach the customer.

I will be teaching an online webinar tomorrow entitled “Hazmat Identification.”  This class will explain how to recognize hazmat, review the nine classes of hazmat, and clarify what sort of aircraft parts are commonly found in each of the nine classes. This class is useful for nearly everyone in the typical aviation parts business.

  • DATE: April 14, 2020
  • TIME: 11:00 am EDT
  • COST: Free
  • REGISTER: Click here. Logging-in is optional and you can register for the class without logging-in (click “Continue Without Login”)

The class is offered as part of the trade associations’ commitment to providing useful training during the Covid-19 crisis. We are scheduled to offer two free webinars per week through the end of May, 2020.

Need more training?  We will be offering a 2-day online hazmat shipping certification class on May 6-7, 2020.  Successful completion of this class results in certification as a hazmat shipper pursuant to both domestic and international law.  You can find out more on our hazmat training page.

Aircraft Lavatories: Are they Hazmats?

We did a little research in response to a member question about whether aircraft lavatories (lavs) should be treated as hazardous materials when shipped.

There are two different considerations in examining lavs as potential hazmats.  The first is the chemicals that are found in the lavs.  The second is the residual human waste that might be found in the lav.

In examining the first consideration, it is important to identify the chemicals that are used in the lav, and that remain in the lav.  Most modern lavs use a non-hazardous chemical material like Blue Juice or Bio-Gem. According to the Blue Juice SDS and the Bio-Gem SDS, they are not hazmats.  However, older lavs have used Formaldehyde as their chemical. Formaldehyde (and its solutions) is typically regulated as a hazmat.

Lavs are typically emptied before being shipped, but a chemical residue is usually shipped as if the chemical remains present.  Therefore, when you have a hazmat-regulated chemical that was present in the lav, as long as there is a residue of that hazmat in the lav, the lav must be treated as hazmat for shipping purposes.  It is not enough to empty the lav – you need to purge the chemical.

Unless it contains or is suspected to contain pathogens (Division 6.2 Infectious Substances) human waste is typically not regulated as a hazardous material under US or ICAO standards.  For comparison, fecal occult blood samples are explicitly excepted from the US and ICAO definition of Infectious Substances. The US Government has explained that some of the factors behind this exception include:

These are specimens collected from healthy patients for routine testing and screening (e.g., DNA analysis, forensic studies, immunologic studies, cancer screening, and nutritional evaluations of infants, children, and adults). The specimen is placed on paper, allowed to saturate the paper, and then dried completely. The specimens pose an extremely minimal risk of infection.

In the special circumstance where you know that the lav has been exposed to specific pathogens, of course, the analysis must include and address the presence of those pathogens.

In short, before shipping the lav you should check the chemical residues in the lav.  If the chemicals and/or chemical residues are hazmats, then the lav is likely shipped as a hazmat (unless the chemicalas are purged) but if they are not hazmats then the lav might not be a hazmat for shipping purposes.

Getting Closure … in Your Hazmat Packagings

It seems like such a simple issue.  Your hazmat packages must be closed.  But there are right ways and wrong ways to close your hazmat packaging!

There are regulations that affect closure.  For example, the United States regulations require hazmat packages to be properly closed.  49 C.F.R. § 173.24(b).  This means that under normal transportation conditions, hazmat will not be released into the environment and the expected effectiveness of the package will remain consistent with the tested effectiveness.  49 C.F.R. § 173.24(b)(1-2).  Correlative requirements exist in the IATA Dangerous Goods Regulations (DGR).

How does closure influence the expected effectiveness?  In order to ensure that closure does not compromise the expected effectiveness of the package, one must follow the manufacturer’s instructions for closing the package.  These instructions can often be found printed on a flap on a specification packaging.  If they are not printed on the packaging itself, though, then they should be found on a document that accompanies the packaging.

As a shipper, you should always expect closure instructions with your specification packagings, because the manufacturer is required to provide closure instructions.  49 C.F.R. § 178.2(c)(1)(i)(B).

The shipper is required to close the package in accordance with the information provided by the manufacturer.  49 C.F.R. § 173.24(f).

The closure instructions may go into tremendous detail, such as requiring you to use the tape that is provided with the packaging (rather than any other tape) and even explaining precisely where the tape must be applied.

But the manufacturer’s closure instructions must also be read in light of the regulations (compliance with both will typically be required).  For example, one regulation that must be obeyed says that a combination packaging containing liquid hazardous materials must be packed so that the closures on the inner packagings are upright (which will make them consistent with the orientation arrows required by the regulations).  49 C.F.R. § 173.24a(a)(1).  When using the U.S. regulations you need to follow the packaging regulations found in Part 173 and when using the IATA DGR, you need to follow the Packing Instruction found in the yellow pages of section five.

Most people in our community ship their hazmats by air according to the ICAO Technical Instructions, as those are reprinted in the IATA DGR.  The procedure for doing this involves selecting an authorized Packing Instruction which guides the shipper in how to legally package the hazardous materials for shipment.  The Packing Instruction will describe what packagings are authorized (e.g. a 4G specification fiberboard box).  But the Packing Instruction may have additional packaging instructions that also must be followed.  For example, the instructions for packaging Dangerous Goods in Apparatus (which is a commonly used proper shipping name in the aviation industry) are currently found in Packing Instruction 962.  Packing Instruction 962 explains that when shipping fuels system components (such as a fuel pump containing fuel residue), each component “must be emptied of fuel as far as practicable and all openings must be sealed securely.”  This must be accomplished before the outer packaging is closed (note that this particular Packing Instruction permits the use of non-specification packaging and therefore the outer packaging may not include manufacturer’s closure instructions meeting the requirements of the hazmat regulations as they apply to specification packagings).

If this article seems confusing, then perhaps you need to join us in one of our hazmat classes!  We will be teaching a live online hazmat class on April 24-25.  The class is live, so you can ask your questions, but it is also online, so you can take the class from the comfort of your own desk.  Our class uses the IATA DGR (and some of the US regulations that remain applicable) and goes through the functional steps you need to accomplish in order to remain compliant with US and international law; successful completion of the class yields a training certificate that meets the legal requirements of the US and most other non-US jurisdictions.